Talk:French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review
Good articleFrench cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starFrench cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat is part of the Protected cruisers of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 29, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 19, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 26, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the French cruisers Pascal (pictured), Descartes, Bugeaud, and Chasseloup-Laubat were deployed to East Asia as part of France's response to the Boxer Uprising in Qing China?
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 19:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Criteria edit

1. Prose

2. Verifiability

3. Depth of Coverage

4. Neutral

5. Stable

6. Illustrations

7. Miscellaneous

Comments edit

1.

  • Rochefort is a duplink
    • Good catch, sometimes I forget to go back through and check for those.

2.

3.

  • I'm going to go ahead and assumed that while the namesake can probably be easily inferred, no source states it directly.
    • Yes, unfortunately.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Honestly, that's it. To me at least, it clearly meets the GA requirements, so I'm going to do something I've never done before and just quick-pass this one. Very good work, I really hope I didn't miss something. Hog Farm (talk) 03:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply