This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article reads, "The mansion was purchased by the French government in 1936,[3] and served as the French chancery (embassy building) on Reservoir Road until 1985." But a house on Kalorama cannot also have been the chancery on Reservoir Road. Does it mean that this was the chancery until the property on Reservoir Road was acquired?Sajita (talk) 13:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
I just want to second this observation. The sentence as written does not make sense. --Willard1979 (talk) 21:27, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
