Talk:Frederick Hawksworth

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Obits for FW Hawksworth (might be useful) The Times, 14th July 1976, p.16. Swindon Evening Advertiser, 13th July 1976. The Railway Magazine, No.122, 1976, p.484.SwindonLocal (talk) 14:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwindonLocal (talk • contribs) 10:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Mythical Hawksworth Pacific

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Keeps coming back like a bad penny. Not one of Nock's finest moments. Its been thoroughly exploded by L A Summers in "Swindon Steam" isbn 978 1 4456 1681 0 and "Backtrack, 14, 238-44." It seems some preliminary studies on what a new pacific might look like were done at the drawing office, completely unauthorised by Hawksworth or the board of directors, and when Hawksworth found out he put a stop to it immediately. There's even a story that Hawksworth destroyed with his own hands the diagram that Nock referred to. Summers quotes Hawksworth as saying "I can say quite categorically that anything you may have read or heard about a proposed pacific type design ascribed to me is pure conjecture and completely without foundation. Such a design was not even discussed." Can we stop bringing the thing back now? 212.159.44.170 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederick Hawksworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051001012247/http://www.swindonweb.com/guid/peophawk0.htm to http://www.swindonweb.com/guid/peophawk0.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic