Talk:Eridge railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

Sussex Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations

Platforms edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm unsure of the number of platforms at Eridge and other stations on the branch. Could someone please verify these? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.239.106 (talk • contribs)

4 at Eridge, only 2 in use. Pickle 19:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removal of spam link edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I've removed the link to the commercial website for the Huntsman public house: the rules regarding spam on Wikipedia are quite clear: "[a]dding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam." Dom Kaos (talk) 14:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've just removed the same link again - if anyone feels there is a valid reason to re-add it (i.e. that the addition is not merely for promotional purposes) please discuss it here first, so that some consensus can be reached Dom Kaos (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic