This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Demographics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DemographicsWikipedia:WikiProject DemographicsTemplate:WikiProject DemographicsDemographics articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
This article relies way too much on primary sources -- i.e., publications by Kaufmann himself. I intend to pare it back on this basis, and then add to it using WP:SECONDARY sources as required by WP:RS and WP:V. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 07:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Peer-reviewed papers, I might add. Bring in additional secondary sources, but don't remove contents supported by papers published in peer-reviewed journals. Nerd271 (talk) 15:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
What's at stake here is primary vs. secondary (not WP:RS). Papers written by Kaufmann are primary sources with regard to material about Kaufmann. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but I don't see a problem with using his papers to talk about this research. Nerd271 (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The problem is that they are primary sources. (WP:PRIMARY: "a scientific paper documenting a new experiment conducted by the author is a primary source on the outcome of that experiment.") Some of Kaufmann's work is controversial; it doesn't work to have Wikipedia editors doing their own interpretation of it by using only his own papers. At a minimum, it would need to be balanced with material based on sources from others who have evaluated Kaufmann's work. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Not really. The problem is that more secondary sources are needed. Go head! Find some and add. As always, readers are free to verify the citations for themselves. Nerd271 (talk) 16:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}