Talk:Don't Touch That Dial

(Redirected from Talk:Episode 2 (WandaVision))
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Favre1fan93 in topic Viewers data
Good articleDon't Touch That Dial has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starDon't Touch That Dial is part of the WandaVision series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 2, 2021Good article nomineeListed
January 14, 2024Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 19, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that to portray "drunk" Vision in the WandaVision episode "Don't Touch That Dial", Paul Bettany took inspiration from Dick Van Dyke's drunk acting in The Dick Van Dyke Show?
Current status: Good article

Episode poster edit

The official WandaVision Twitter account just released posters for the first 2 episodes. I'm guessing they will do this each week for every new episode. I think we should use them for the episode pages. - Richiekim (talk) 18:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Per my similar response on the ep 1 talk, the previous ones, while released before the episodes released, are specifically for each decade, and we have the commentary within each article for them. Those are the ones we should use I believe, as they are "closer" to the official series poster. These just seem like fun poster takes on old advertisements. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Title edit

Disney Plus updated the title today and the episode is officially called "Don't Touch That Dial" if someone wants to redirect the page. -- Zoo (talk) 22:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Viewers data edit

So per this, more people watched the second episode than the first one. How can that be right? Adamstom.97. Just asking --Franar8 (talk) 15:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've reworded the sentence to better reflect what was stated in the article. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply