Talk:Emperor Murakami
Latest comment: 5 years ago by अभय नातू in topic Inconsistent birth year
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How better to present these dates? edit
In the Kugyō section:
................................................... lifetime, 880-949 .... time in office (946-949) ........... Kampaku (946-949), Fujiwara no Tadahira (藤原忠平), 880-949
- Kampaku, Fujiwara no Tadahira (藤原忠平), 946-949.[1]
- Daijō-daijin, Fujiwara no Tadahira (藤原忠平), 936-949.[2]
- Sadaijin, Fujiwara no Saneyori (藤原実頼), 947-967.[3]
- Udaijin, Fujiwara no Saneyori (藤原実頼), 946-947.[4]
- Udaijin, Fujiwara no Morosuke (藤原師輔), 947-955.[5]
- Udaijin, Fujiwara no Akitada (藤原顕忠), 960-965
- Udaijin, Minamoto no Taka-akira (源高明), 966-967
In the intial edit, I intended to present the dates during which someone held a specific court title, but that now seems too ambitious for a start-level article. The intention had been to explain the sequence of serial officeholders with these dates.
Instead, it's probably better to simply list the birth/death dates. Arguably, it might be possible (or even preferable) to include both sets of dates as the information becomes available ...? --Ooperhoofd 14:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- I won't be commenting on this specific case, but generally-speaking this kind of matter should be done in a very systematic manner, I think, because, I am assuming, that lists similar to this one may/should be added to other articles of emperors too. So, why don't you post something like to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Japan or other places. -- Taku 02:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Inconsistent birth year edit
Article introduction states birth year to be 924 but is categorized as 926 births. Which one is accurate? -- अभय नातू (talk) 03:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)