Talk:Edison (company)

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

citation needed

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

I've added a source at the end of the first paragraph and deleted the citation needed tag. Hope it's ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floydrosebridge (talk • contribs) 17:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

It still needs better references. Beagel (talk) 19:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

how can I add better references? the ones I've added are the ones where I've found the text

Please see WP:RS to learn what kind of references are needed. How to create and format references, you need to use the reference template (Template:Cite web) between <ref> and </ref> signs. Beagel (talk) 12:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm about to make some changes on this page, I'll add some paragraphs, and of course all the references,I hope it'll be all right! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floydrosebridge (talk • contribs) 14:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I saw that my changes to this page have been cancelled. Some information that are now on this page are old, uncorrect and misleading(for example Edison is no longer part of Montedison, and the "operation" section is not updated) I've replaced this information with new datas, adding all the references not only from edison's site (that, by the way, is the most reliable source for some information that cannot be found on other sites) but also from third party sites. I don't know what to do, I've tried to follow wiki's rules but my text has been cancelled anyway, can someone please support me step by step so that I can edit the text in the right way? It is important to provide information about the company that are right and up to date. Thanks(talk —Preceding undated comment added 09:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC).Reply

The "Equity" data in the infobox is not supported by any source, I've deleted it.

First of all, Wikipedia is not a tool to promote the company; that mean it should NOT to included the promotional tone. Please avoid wordiness and repetitions as it seen as a company promotion. Second, not every bit of information about the company is notable. If no third party reliable sources find that bit of information notable to publish, it is probably not notable and does not belong here. Third, if you have any connection to the company (and based on your edits you have), you should discuss all your edits at the talk page before making changes. Fourth, one or two-sentence paragraphs about operations by country is discouraged. It may be useful if there is more information but this is not a case right now. Beagel (talk) 12:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Sede Edison Foro Buonaparte.JPG Nominated for Deletion

Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

An image used in this article, File:Sede Edison Foro Buonaparte.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sede Edison Foro Buonaparte.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi everyone, I work for Edison and I would like to make some changes to this page, because some information are not up to date, for example, our president has changed and also our shareholders. I'll add all the sources I can find, I only have one question: is it possible to use articles in italian as a source? I will wait for an answer and then start with the corrections. Thank you 151.22.38.81 (talk) 13:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Davide151.22.38.81 (talk) 13:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, please do add or fix any mistakes. I would read our policy page on conflict of interest first. Sources in Italian are not ideal but acceptable. Feel free to ask me any questions you might have. Cheers, --Patrick (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I don't think there will be any conflict of interest, I'm just changing basic informations, I won't try to promote the company in any way :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.22.38.81 (talk) 13:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for disclosing that you work for the company. More importantly, thank you for making wikipedia better. --Patrick (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edison (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic