Talk:Eden Taylor-Draper

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Videonasteeez in topic Date of birth

Untitled

edit

this page has clearly been written by her mother, its hilarious —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.215.161 (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image File:Belle Dingle.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Date of birth

edit

As the birthdate in this biography continues to be changed, and as no reliable source has ever been provided for verification, I have removed the date from the article. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 22:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is absolutely ridiculous that her birth date keeps being changed and removed. The girl was born on 27th October 1997, as stated on her IMDB. THAT IS WHEN SHE WAS BORN - WHY DOES THIS KEEP BEING REMOVED??? - Noxy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.172.138 (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
It gets removed because the edits fail WP:BLP. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's funny to look at the edit history of this article to to see verified information repeatedly removed from this article. Apparently posts from verified Twitter posts aren't reliable. Sure - that is your interpretation and you seemingly have nothing better to do with your time than remove information instead of actually contributing content.

It's funny these editors who blindly state certain references aren't reliable, when of course they are 99% of other editors and admins have no problem with them. Amazing that an admin regularly egages in edit wars to push their POV.

Videonasteeez (talk) 17:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

See WP:BLP, and also WP:NPA. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oh, and they blindly refer to guidelines that don't back up their claims too. In addition to making no contribution to the article in question or leaving referenced details in place, they run off an try and get another editor to lock the page. Incredible.

Videonasteeez (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply