Talk:Ebullism

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Marooned MB in topic Polish version

Dicdef edit

This is just a definition of a phenomenon dealt with in the decompression sickness articles. It should be transwikified. JFW | T@lk 21:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is not. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 06:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

More info edit

This article has some more info. -- Steved424 17:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pilots and astronauts consume excessive amounts of salt edit

The first citation does not support the claim that "pilots and astronauts consume excessive amounts of salt". The second citation merely reiterates the well-known fact that adding salt to water raises its boiling point slightly. It is WP:SYNTH to assume that consuming excessive amounts of salt will raise the boiling point of the blood. In any case, ebullism is caused by dissolved gasses coming out of solution as the pressure reduces, not by the blood boiling. I'm going to remove this paragraph unless a source can be found to support its assertions. --RexxS (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The solubility of a gas in a liquid changes with pressure. Excess consumption of salt alters blood pressure.
Also that is why you use other inert breathing gases to eliminate or reduce dissolved gases in the blood.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.14.94 (talk) 08:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes Henry's Law is well-known, as is the fact that some people experience raised blood pressure as a result of excessive salt intake. The Nitrox and Decompression sickness articles contain the information on increasing the fraction of oxygen to reduce dissolved gasses in the blood. We have articles on Trimix, Heliox, Hydrox, Argox and Hydreliox that will explain to you the use of other inert gases under pressure - none of them are used to "eliminate or reduce dissolved gases in the blood".
But where is the evidence that "pilots and astronauts consume excessive amounts of salt"? I'll take out that unsupported claim until a citation is found. --RexxS (talk) 10:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ebullism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ebullism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Serious confusion between decompression sickness and ebullism edit

The definitions, mechanism and prevention of these two conditions are not the same. Ebullism is caused by vaporisation of water at lower pressures, but more quickly and more easily reversible. decompression sickness by bubble formation of dissolved gas (nitrogen). Breathing oxygen can prevent DCS by flushing out nitrogen, but will have no effect on ebullism, so some of the content is basically irrelevant or wrong. I may fix if I get around to it. Murray et al 2013 should help if I can get the full article · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 14:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Removed misinformation and irrelevant information from prevention section, added basic information with ref. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 06:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Harmonisation of reference formatting edit

I plan to ensure that all references use the same formatting, as recommended in the MoS. To make this easier to do and maintain I intend to convert in text reference definitions to list based references and use CS1 formatting and date formatting consistently. If anyone who has contributed significantly to the content and referencing of the article has an objection, please make a suggestion for a reasonably practicable alternative which will be equally or more effective for achieving these goals over the long term. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 12:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Polish version edit

I wanted to add a link to Polish version https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebulizm but got error that I'm unable to resolve or understand:

The link plwiki:Ebulizm is already used by Item Q16542740. You may remove it from Q16542740 if it does not belong there or merge the Items if they are about the exact same topic. If the situation is more complex, please see Help:Sitelinks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marooned MB (talkcontribs) 10:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply