Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health

Latest comment: 17 days ago by Z1720 in topic Good article reassessment for Aspirin


Good article reassessment for Decompression equipment

edit

Decompression equipment has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Beryllium

edit

Beryllium has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Decompression practice

edit

Decompression practice has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Maintaining lists on WP vs. linking to primary sources elsewhere

edit

I am wondering whether pages that list hazardous materials, in this case Highly hazardous chemical, should include the actual government-maintained lists or if they should simply link to external sites that are kept up-to-date.

My concern with leaving the list intact is that, unless it is regularly maintained, laypeople may come here for information and may make decisions that do not reflect best available data. I removed the list at "highly hazardous chemical" once but the change was reverted and wanted to seek the opinion of others thinking about occupational safety/health. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Copper

edit

Copper has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:19, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Aspirin

edit

Aspirin has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:02, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply