Talk:E233 series

Best choice of images

Editor 銚電神 has now twice replaced some the good-quality images in this article with unfortunately poor quality photos taken by himself...

• 
  This image was replaced by...
• 
  this platform image

• 
  This image (officially assessed as a "Quality Image" on Commons) was replaced by...
• 
  this mediocre image

• 
  And this image was replaced by...
• 
  this platform image

Maybe other editors can comment. --DAJF (talk) 14:07, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

I agree that the new images are poor quality. User:銚電神 should provide justifiable reason to replace the images. Otherwise the edit should be reverted. --Sushiya (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

I also agree. --Epicgenius (talk) 13:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

 Done - A week has now passed, and as 銚電神 has chosen not to comment here, and there has been no opposition, I have restored the earlier higher-quality images in the article in accordance with WP:CONSENSUS. --DAJF (talk) 02:49, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

E233-3000 series on the Shōnan-Shinjuku Line?

I have heard that E233-3000 series trains are being introduced to the Shōnan-Shinjuku Line. It's just that I am not sure when they came in, in 2014 or 2015? Are they operating on through services to other lines, or are they just services to the Shōnan-Shinjuku line itself? SlitherioFan2016 (talk) 04:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

That's right, thanks for updating the article. I have added a source for the introduction of E233-3000s on the line in March 2015. --DAJF (talk) 08:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on E233 series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130609084841/http://www.saitama-np.co.jp/news06/07/04.html to http://www.saitama-np.co.jp/news06/07/04.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140224020407/http://www.fnn-news.com/news/headlines/articles/CONN00263603.html to http://www.fnn-news.com/news/headlines/articles/CONN00263603.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

The scrapped section 2008- ???? is irrelevant

The 7 cars were scrapped due to fire damage, however retirements have not started so it is irrelevant for now SBS2803M (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

According to the article, a total of 15 cars have been scrapped (5 cars E233-0 & 10 cars E233-1000), so I'd disagree with the statement that its irrelevant. Also @SBS2803M: you mentioned fire damage, I thought the damage was due to collisions? Regards, Nyamo Kurosawa (huh?) 15:18, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

@Nyamo Kurosawa someone typed into wiki that the damage was fire damage — Preceding unsigned comment added by SBS2803M (talk • contribs) 15:21, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

I just say is accident damage SBS2803M (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. Regards, Nyamo Kurosawa (huh?) 15:36, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• JR East E233-1000 Series No.157 Rapid.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:36, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

• JR East E233-0 Series T3 Oume Special Rapid.jpg
• JR East E233-3000 Series E-08 Rapid Ofuna.jpg
• JR East E233-8500 Series N36 Rapid Tachikawa.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• JR East E233-3000 Series E-03 set at Ueno-Tokyo Line.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

E233, 203 class, and PNR

Since E233 replaced the 203, the only places you might see the 203's is at Indonesia and Philippines. Go check em out boys