Talk:Droga5

Campaigns data move from page on 7 Feb 2012 - move back as considered needed

Notable Campaigns

Lots of text in the history if needed. Ariconte (talk) 01:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

COI note

It would be good if uninvolved editors went through the references and tried to develop some new ones. I have tagged and an admitted employee (User talk:Carly.n.bennett and here) does not agree. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

I noticed the request for attention on Wikiproject Business and gave the article a rough trim. Here's my rationale on the article overall:

• There is too little information about the company's history, which is what is most important to us
• There are far too many primary sources, instead of secondary sources
• There was a lot of information about individual executives and staffing, which isn't something we normally include
• A company's notable works is something we include, but we are careful to be selective about those that are included
• Awards is something we do include, but we are careful only to include those that are significant.

Corporate 14:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Droga5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120713031842/http://www.canneslions.com:80/inspiration/past_grands_prix_advert.cfm?sub_channel_id=299 to http://www.canneslions.com/inspiration/past_grands_prix_advert.cfm?sub_channel_id=299
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121001114625/http://www.canneslions.com/inspiration/videos.cfm?media_id=433 to http://www.canneslions.com/inspiration/videos.cfm?media_id=433&tag=103&pg=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

COI

As noted in the article linked to above, it's rather obvious that @WaverlyW: is a single purpose account with a conflict of interest here. We desperately need some neutral editors to have a look at this. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 10:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)