Talk:Dongdaemun

Latest comment: 4 months ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 31 December 2023

can someone upload a better pic? --DandanxD 05:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Jongno 6ga-dong edit

i'm really getting confused by this "ga" business. What does that mean exactly? Anyway, I would consider relinking it to the proper dong, but i'm not sure exactly which dong that will be in the end since the list on the Jongno-gu page separates them kind of strangely. User:Appletrees knows best. I'll be patient I guess. DaronDierkes (talk) 03:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Ga" (wikt:街) is a transliterated term to refer to "street" or "avenue" in Korean. Until stubbing the dong in Seoul, I had never cared about differentiating the dongs with "ga"in Gangbuk area (areas surrounding Jongno-gu and Jung-gu which is the counterpart of Gangnam area including not only Gangnam-gu, but also Seocho-gu, Songpa-gu which has no "ga" in their name). --Appletrees (talk) 04:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
So what should the location link be on this page? Jongno 6ga-dong is kind of a vague link. DaronDierkes (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gates in Seoul edit

"Since the South Gate (Namdaemun) was set on fire on February 10, 2008, Dongdaemun is one of only two main gates that have survived, the other being the North Gate or Bukdaemun (more formally Sukjeongmun). One more minor gate known as Changuimun also still stands, bringing the total number of surviving gates to three. The West Gate (Seodaemun) was demolished earlier." This is not accurate. Other gates, such as HaeHwaMun and KwangHeeMun also exist. I'm delorting this whole paragraph. Eunsung (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 31 December 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply



HeunginjimunDongdaemunWP:COMMONNAME, see ngram. For non-regular observers, keep in mind that common name tends to outweigh "official names" on Wikipedia, hence Cleopatra and not "Cleopatra VII Thea Philopator" for article title. toobigtokale (talk) 14:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support per the ngrams provided Dantus21 (talk) 00:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.