Talk:Donald Fowler

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Benefac in topic Photograph

Photograph edit

Image seems unrelated to the actual individual. I've tried removing it but don't have permissions or a legitimate photograph of this man.

Agreed. The photo is from 1972. That's absurd, and deceptive to our readers. There are many, more recent, Creative Commons photos of Fowler available. E.g., here is one: https://images.c-span.org/Files/d76/2398-190249-1.jpg/Thumbs/height.182.no_border.width.320.jpg
Donald Fowler
File:Donald Fowler, on C-Span, 10th December 2005.jpg
But even that one is from 2005 -- over a dozen years ago. How about something even more recent? Benefac (talk) 14:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Donald Fowler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply