Talk:Domingos Passos

Notes from copyedit

@El Descamisado, nice work! Here are some notes as I read:

• I added a new "disappeared" parameter to the infobox, if you can add the date of Passos's disappearance
• For general readers, the labor union acronyms can be hard to read (alphabet soup), so I tried to only use acronyms that are recalled later in the article
• The Clevelândia do Norte prisoners were housed "in barracks": Is this barracks or more like sheds? I imagine the latter.
• "Passos gathered around eight deportees": Did he gather eight deportees (i.e., the nine protested together) or did he gather around eight deportees (i.e., Passos protested while eight deportees watched)?
• "the indifference facing that initiative": Which initiative? The congress or sending Passos to the congress?
• Is "Largo do Brás" the same as pt:Largo da Concórdia?
• What was his role or legacy in the Brazilian anarchist movement? The article doesn't say.

After addressing the above, the article looks ready for a Wikipedia:Good article nomination! czar 22:56, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for this copyedit and for the commentaries, Czar! I already added the year of Passos's disappearance and clarified the passages that you mentioned and seemed ambiguous or confusing. About Largo do Brás, it is the same as Largo da Concórdia, but as Dulles (1980) refers to it as Largo do Brás, I preferred to maintain it that way. I will do some additional research about Passos's legacy in the Brazilian anarchist movement to add this to the article. By now, I founded a more precise source about his travel to Pelotas and already changed this passage in the text and in the introduction. El Descamisado (talk) 16:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Sounds good! Largo do Brás is fine to keep, of course—mainly was asking so we could create a redirect. czar 08:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

@El Descamisado, any objections to nominating this for Good Article status? Would you like to do so yourself? czar 06:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)