Talk:Devocalization

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 2601:8C3:8680:37C0:2EF3:2394:FF1:8B2C in topic A troll has clearly been at the "reasons favoring" section

"in most instances" edit

This article says that "in most instances" proper training will fix compulsive barking. But there are no sources or citations provided. Overall the article is POV and severely lacking in citations/references. This should be rememdied.

In the meantime, I settled for correcting the spelling of "procedure". Throughout the article, the author spelled it "proceedure" so I fixed it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.245.138.168 (talkcontribs) 15:09, December 21, 2006 (UTC)

procedure edit

I came here and fixed some spelling; however after fixing it I checked the article's history and I can see that someone keeps reverting the spelling to be incorrect. Why? 'PROCEEDURE' is not correct, fool. Stop reverting it. If you want people to take this article seriously please stop changing the spelling, you ass. Someone keeps reverting "procedure" to "proceedure" what a moron STOP IT. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.245.138.168 (talkcontribs) 15:17, December 21, 2006 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Devocalization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A troll has clearly been at the "reasons favoring" section edit

I'm not an editor, but I doubt these phrases meet Wikipedia's standards:

"The owners can live in peace, they may even devocalize human children who they don't want to hear. The owners can relax and not have to train their dog. They can also remove teeth to avoid any further nuisance."

Just wanting to give a heads up. 2601:8C3:8680:37C0:2EF3:2394:FF1:8B2C (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply