This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I did some basic copy-editing. What was the BS about a statement coming down to "works under Aman, not under Aman"?! This was hiding behind links, with "Aman" in the 1st instance hiding behind a link, and the 2nd time in the open.
We still lack clarity:
"... examining... scenarios... of the Research Department [RD]... The unit works as ... part of the [RD].
... Unit... head... operates... under the head of Military Intelligence Directorate [NID] and not under the head of the [RD]."
So: part of the RD, but its head answers to MID chief? Either very sophisticated, or plain BS.
Befote my edit, it came down to "Unit... head... operates... under the head of [link to : Military Intelligence Directorate. Visible: Aman] and not under the head of the [RD] (Aman)."
Are these the twisted ways of military intelligence, or the BS ways of poor editing?
PS: I see there was no editing. @TnZr: created this in 2020, probably based on a Hebrew article, never did anything else, and that's what we have, period. Nobody checked on the content. Arminden (talk) 11:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
