Talk:Devi Upanishad

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Nvvchar in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Devi Upanishad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


Will review. @Nvvchar: Very well-written article! Sainsf <^>Talk all words 04:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks for the review. User:Ms Sarah Welch who has collaborated with me will also clarify some issues raised by you.

Lead edit

  • Who is Cheever Mackenzie Brown?
  • Added, with source
  • Brahman (ultimate metaphysical Reality), from her arise Prakṛti ..."and" from her...
  • Done by @Nvvchar
  • she is bliss and non-bliss, the Vedas and what is different from it, the born and the unborn, and all of the universe make this a separate line.
  • Done by @Nvvchar

Foundation and structure edit

  • Link Brahman
  • Done
  • asserts that from Goddess "the" Goddess
  • Done by @Nvvchar

Contents edit

  • Brahman should be linked in the earlier section, not here.
  • Agreed. Done. All later duplinks removed.
  • Is not the definition of Brahman getting repeated here?
  • Yes. Removed repetition. The sources have been checked and moved to the sections above.
  • In the 2nd line, italics have not been used properly.
  • Corrected.
  • Identify Griffith, McDaniel
  • Added, with source/wikilink.
  • "Begat" is an archaic word. Use modern spellings
  • Yes. Rephrased after checking source.
  • All knowing knowledge What does this mean?
  • Probably a drafting error. Changed to "All knowledge...".

Influence in Tantra edit

  • Simply say McDaniel.
  • Done by @Nvvchar
  • Duplinks: mantra, shakti, Saraswati
  • Done by @Nvvchar

List of duplinks:

  • Who is the Goddess? - Purusha, Prakrti
  • The sources assert she is both. Duplinks removed.
  • Devi stuti and iconography - Vedas,Rudras,Adityas,Soma,Prajapati, Indra
  • Removed.

@Sainsf: I also removed all cites from the lead, something that required moving some text and all sources to the main article. So you will see two new sections Etymology and History. @Nvvchar: Please double check my edits and if I missed anything or duplinks, please fix. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • @Sainsf: The lead and the text have been slightly reorganized in view of shiting of refrences from the lead. Other wise all review issue have been addressed.Nvvchar. 01:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Nvvchar: Promoted. Congrats! Sainsf <^>Talk all words 05:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply