Talk:Denny Substation

Denny Substation has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 1, 2017. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Denny Substation appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 March 2017, and was viewed approximately 1,943 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a new electrical substation in Seattle will feature a dog park, a theater, a walking path, and public art?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Denny Substation.

Wikipedia

United States: Washington / Seattle / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

GA Review

Latest comment: 7 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Denny Substation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 19:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reviewing later.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 19:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The lead does feel a bit short for the size of the article. Maybe add a bit more of the history to the lead?
- Y Done.
Any sources on Walsh Construction being the main contractor? (Maybe mention it outside the infobox?)
- Y Added it to the body with a source.
Day 1 is the HQ of Amazon.com.
- Bezos's office is in Day 1, but the entire 5-building complex will be the headquarters when completed.
  - My mistake then.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 21:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
How reliable is Slate?
- Slate, being a web magazine rather than a website, definitely fits the reliability criteria with its use of professional editors and writers.
  - Good enough.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 21:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

@CycloneIsaac: Sorry for the late reply, but I've finally found time this week to work on this. Sounder Bruce 09:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Passing.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 21:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic