Talk:Demiurge Studios

Latest comment: 1 year ago by IceWelder in topic Inaccurate Employee's Number

Green Day Rock Band edit

Maybe this gives some clarity on the rumor. Found on http://www.rockbandaide.com. http://rockbandaide.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/GDRBWii.jpg SkySilver (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Intro violates WP:NPOV edit

With phrases like "one of the most daring, innovative development teams in the game industry" the intro looks like it violates WP:NPOV. I'd edit myself if I had the time, any takers? ⌘ torpy (talk) 07:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Inaccurate Employee's Number edit

The number of employees listed in the sidebar (listed as 51 as I write this) is inaccurate. Perhaps it should be removed so that it doesn't have to be updated constantly. Rushsteve1 (talk) 01:09, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Update: I have changed the employee number to "100+" since that is more accurate, if less precise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushsteve1 (talkcontribs) 01:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Rushsteve1: Where does this number come from? IceWelder [] 07:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
I got this number from their LinkedIn page
https://www.linkedin.com/company/demiurge-studios
This page states the company as having 101 employees on LinkedIn, and the company size as 50-200 people.
I was unsure if this was a good reference, and the previous number was (to my knowledge) uncited. So I opted to leave this uncited, and make the number imprecise to reflect that. Rushsteve1 (talk) 13:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
LinkedIn numbers are rarely accurate because they only count LinkedIn profiles that claim to work for the company. This accounts neither for outdated profiles, nor for fabricated ones. It also does not have to be complete as not everyone has LinkedIn. I would rather have accurate old numbers than inaccurate new numbers, but it appears the former number of 51 was neither dated nor sourced. I chose to remove it entirely instead. The Boston.com source from 2008 theoretically has one (24) but a 15-year-old number might really stretch what we can consider useful information. IceWelder [] 13:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply