Talk:Day-care sex-abuse hysteria

Latest comment: 6 months ago by HandThatFeeds in topic untitled (rename)

Country Walk edit

An alternative view on Country Walk can be found at http://blogs.brown.edu/pols-1821t-2010fall-s01/files/2010/12/Country_Walk_Myths.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.236.111.98 (talk) 09:42, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

It probably should be mentioned, although I seem to recall that particular journal has been shown to be sufficiently biased as to be probably unreliable. Still, it is an alternative view. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

That article is the work of Ross E. Cheit, and is now in the "Further reading" section. But it only discusses the Country Walk Case. But Cheit defends most of these cases, so I'll replace that link here with a different article of his where he defends at least 3 of these prosecutions, as well as another article that criticizes this work. (These are all already linked at "Country Walk Case".) But we might consider adapting the paragraph on his work from "Country Walk Case". DougHill (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

untitled (rename) edit

shouldn't this page be retitled to include "global sex trafficking rings"? in particular, cases in which victims never reported a crime but word of the crime eventually made it to the police, and or for-profit prosecutions…? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.49.159.90 (talk) 17:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

No. This is describing a specific phenomenon, one where sex abuse never actually happened. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 13:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply