Talk:David Weild IV

Latest comment: 3 years ago by P,TO 19104 in topic COI disclosure
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Weild IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Weild IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

COI disclosure

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

My name is Ilia Koldomasov, I am from Ukraine and work for Weild & Co as an external communications specialist. At the moment I want to improve this page according to WP:Paid, WP:COI and others. My previous revision has been rejected, so on this page I will notify you of the following changes that I think should be made. First, the warning templates are vandalism and spam and require cleaning. Secondly, the information about the JOBS Act is outdated. I suggest you update this using the following text and links: Third, the information about personal life is not correct.

Wikipedia is not a spam basket, so we need a better and more correct version of this page. I personally will refrain from editing this page, and on the Talk page I will only offer changes. I hope that other participants will understand.

--Koldomasov (talk) 16:35, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the disclosure, Koldomasov. The information about his personal life will need a reference to a reliable source, which you've not provided. I'm not sure how much information about the JOBS Act we need though - that's better covered at Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, whereas in this article we should be focusing just on Weild's role in it. In any case, please propose revisions and additions to the article here on the talk page so that they can be reviewed by editors who don't have a COI. There are instructions for doing this at WP:COIREQ. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

---Cordless Larry (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Undisclosed paid|date=September 2017, advert|date=November 2020, expert needed|date=November 2020 - unrelevant spam due IP-edits, this is a violation of WP rules. Please clean-up this templates, for first. Vandalism! Thank.

21:43, 24 November 2020‎ 128.124.57.135 talk‎ 15,129 bytes -108‎ -rmv due vandalism template spamming undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit COI template removed Reverted curprev 15:46, 24 November 2020‎ 94.153.72.220 talk‎ 15,237 bytes +67‎ violation

--Koldomasov (talk) 17:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Koldomasov, what I meant was for you to propose the exact text that you want to be added or amended here, such as "Please add the following paragraph to X section..." or "Please change A to B". Cordless Larry (talk) 17:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposal for Page Updating

edit

JOBS Acr Paragraph

In 2017 the “Confidential Filings” provisions.[1]

In 2019 the “Testing the Waters” provisions.[2]

In 2020 the SEC increased the limits on Crowdfunding from $5 million to $1.07 million and Reg. A+ to $75 million from $50 million.[3]

JOBS Act 3.0 Paragraph In the U.S. there is bipartisan interest to improve capital formation given the decline in the number of start-ups and IPOs. David Weild presents as a JOBS Act 3.0 like a new form of the stock exchange - a “Venture Exchange” that would be optimized for small public companies, their investors, and the brokerage firms and investment banks required to support them.[4]

In 2009, Senator Kaufman gave a speech on the floor of the US Senate where he concluded, “The question, finally, is this: How can we create a market structure that works for a $25 million IPO — both in the offering and the secondary aftermarket. If we can answer that question, Mr. President, this country will be back in business.”[5]

JOBS Act 3.0 which was known the JOBS and Investor Confidence Act of 2008 passed the House in an overwhelmingly bipartisan manner (406-4).[6] It was an omnibus bill that included legislation to create a new form of stock exchange (a “venture exchange”) but the legislation stalled in the Senate when the Trump Administration shut the budget process down over building the Wall and the legislation got stuck in limbo. This was an attempt to create an exchange that would incentivize the aftermarket support and distribution required to successfully bring back the small IPO.[7]

References

  1. ^ "SEC.gov | SEC's Division of Corporation Finance Expands Popular JOBS Act Benefit to All Companies". www.sec.gov. Retrieved 2020-11-30.
  2. ^ "SEC.gov | SEC Adopts New Rule to Allow All Issuers to "Test-the-Waters"". www.sec.gov. Retrieved 2020-11-30.
  3. ^ "Huge news: SEC to raise Regulation Crowdfunding limit to $5M from $1.07M". republic.co. Retrieved 2020-11-30.
  4. ^ "David Weild: The Collapse of the Small IPO is Undermining Entrepreneurship, Tokenization May Help Fix the Problem". Crowdfund Insider. 2019-02-26. Retrieved 2020-11-30.
  5. ^ "UD Library: Senator Ted Kaufman — Senator for Delaware: Newsroom - Press Release". green.lib.udel.edu. Retrieved 2020-11-30.
  6. ^ Gonzalez, Guadalupe (2018-07-16). "What Is the JOBS Act 3.0? New Bill Could Make It Easier to Go Public". Inc.com. Retrieved 2020-11-30.
  7. ^ Drive, Kevin M. LaCroix 2000 Auburn; Suite 200Beachwood; LaCroix", "legalName":"Kevin M.; LaCroix", "name":"Kevin M.; "telephone":"378-7817"; Drive, "streetAddress":"2000 Auburn; Suite 200 "; "addressLocality":"Beachwood"; "addressRegion":"OH" (2018-07-24). "House Passes JOBS Act 3.0". The D&O Diary. Retrieved 2020-11-30.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

--Koldomasov (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Not done As Cordless Larry said, I'm not sure the detailed history behind the JOBS act is specifically relevant to Weild's biography. In addition, I have some concerns that the proposed writing is not very neutral. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 01:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply