This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Tried to address the POV issues, removing a number of claims that could not be substantiated. Still, this article is difficult due to limited information about the actual topic (qiegao) but lots about the "incident". The article seems unbalanced in consequence; yet POV concerns linger. There is always the possibility that information about qiegao-the-food will result from coverage of qiegao-the-incident. I'll keep my eyes peeled. Richigi (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply