Talk:Crossing Hennessy

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Are you sure this is a Hong Kong remake of a Hollywood movie? If you have seen both movies, the stories are completely different. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.240.122.60 (talk) 21:39, 2 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reading the plot summary on the Crossing Delancy page, Crossing Hennessy is, at most, a VERY loose adaptaion. The plot summary is also confusing and overly detailed in some parts. I'm going to edit some of the plot, and I'm deleting the sentence about the remake until someone can provide a reference regarding this. SunsetFlare (talk) 10:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Crossing Hennessy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply