Talk:Cramster.com

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

NPOV tag edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

This article reads like an ad. I've added an NPOV tag.--75.83.69.196 (talk) 13:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've made some changes to the article in an attempt to reach a WP:NPOV. That may or may not be enough to remove the NPOV tag. Someone else should check the edits and make the determination of whether the tag can be removed. Transmissionelement (talk) 14:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's looking good, but can you reword the 'features' section a little more? tedder (talk) 15:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

You were right about that! On second edit, it seemed like the Feature descriptions were non-essential and more there for self promotion, and thus the section was deleted. Moved part of the description and reference to the first line description of the company. It looks reasonably neutral to me at this point, but others can judge whether the tag should be removed. Transmissionelement (talk) 21:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to be bold and remove it. If others have specific concerns, they can add it back and give specific examples here. tedder (talk) 21:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cramster.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic