This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Dorfer, Tobias (31 May 2017). "Was bedeutet Trumps #covfefe?". Zeit Online. Retrieved 1 June 2017. "Trotz der andauernden negativen Presse ...", so ließe sich die Nachricht übersetzen, doch dann folgt das Wort "covfefe", das zwar bereits einen eigenen Wikipedia-Eintrag hat, den Autoren des renommierten Wörterbuchs Merriam-Webster jedoch völlig unbekannt ist. (Link to Google Translate version of article){{cite news}}: External link in |quote= (help)
Latest comment: 5 months ago5 comments4 people in discussion
it's not 'misunderstood' . The meaning is unkown that's a completely different thing to a misunderstanding. Misunderstanding is being *mistaken* about what the meaning is. This needs fixing. 82.9.56.21 (talk) 20:53, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Done. It was a recent POV change. DeCausa (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
It is updated to not include political agenda which violates terms of use. It's now reflecting facts and a new trademark which now produces coffee under the name Covfefe as well as the history of how the word was coined. 2600:100C:B257:EECF:0:4:36E8:3901 (talk) 05:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
well now a transgender guy named "MaybeirsMir" reversed my edit of pure informative meaning and relation of the word calling my edit outside objectives when that's exactly what I did. Stick to objective TRUTH rather than conjecture and subjective criticism which it is now.
well now a transgender guy named "MaybeirsMir" reversed my edit of pure informative meaning and relation of the word calling my edit outside objectives when that's exactly what I did. Stick to objective TRUTH rather than conjecture and subjective criticism which it is now.
Your edit was a pretty thinly-veiled advertisement. You also failed to provide a source. You should probably try to understand, or at the very least, skim through Wikipedia's guidelines and policies before you complain about who's "running" it. miranda:3 06:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}