Talk:Cosmopolitan Church

Latest comment: 7 years ago by SkyWarrior in topic Requested move 5 February 2017

Requested move 5 February 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) SkyWarrior 16:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


Cosmopolitan ChurchUCCP Cosmopolitan Church – this is the actual name. Lalaloopsywinx (talk) 11:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Question evidence please. An IP added "Not to be confused with the church Cosmopolitan Church that separated from the UCCP." without source. I have removed it pending results of this RM. What is the source for this? And if so what difference does it make, the building is still the building. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose Cosmopolitan Church is a valid name for the establishment as stated in the heritage marker. Also as per WP:CONCISE, even though UCCP Cosmopolitan Church may be the legal name of the church (the entity, not the building), "Cosmopolitan Church" would suffice to refer both to the entity and the building. Create "UCCP Cosmopolitan Church" redirect to this page. Also I can't find any information, that the church has re-affliated itself with the UCCP.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.