Talk:Cosmati
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End date tradition questionable edit
Although the craft itself died out in the fourteenth century, the suggestion that it was because of a lack of ecclesiastical support is excessively specific and needs evidentiary support, as the symbology described by Richard Sporley[1] was central to the planning of the Council of Constance and remained central to Catholic exegesis thereafter until at least the mid-seventeenth century in the work of the Breughel family.[2] In the context of the climatological and epidemic crises of the first half of the fourteenth century, it is at least equally as probable that the craftsmen either died or moved into a different speciality to survive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.129.122.69 (talk)
References edit
- ^ http://www.westminster-abbey.org/our-history/art/cosmati-pavement
- ^ OR, publication anticipated 2014-15. Jeremy Main
Cosmati vs Cosmatesque edit
Cosmatesque and Cosmati seems to imply that a Cosmati pavement is one made by the Cosmati family and a Cosmatesque pavement is one in that style but not necessarily by the Cosmati family.
However, [1] and [2] describe the pavement in Westminster Abbey (which was not made by the Cosmati family) as a Cosmati pavement.
Should this ambiguity of the term "Cosmati" be mentioned?
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cosmati. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051217194347/http://www.nexusjournal.com/reviews_v5n2-Sharp.html to http://www.nexusjournal.com/reviews_v5n2-Sharp.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051228085311/http://www.nexusjournal.com/reviews_v5n2-Williams.html to http://www.nexusjournal.com/reviews_v5n2-Williams.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)