Talk:Consuelo Vanderbilt

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ttulinsky in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

In 1895 $2.5 million. Can we get a sensible figure in today's dollars? The figure has recently been upped by an anon. editor with a checkered career of altering statistics in Wikipedia. --Wetman 06:36, 5 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

"Penultimate"?

edit
penultimate marital prize of the Victorian age

Penultimate means second best or second to last. So who was the ultimate marital prize of the Victorian age? Binabik80 18:04, 25 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Probably the Prince of Wales. Oh well, doesn't matter, the word was long ago edited out. Ariadne55 (talk) 03:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Height

I recently enjoyed a tour of Blenheim Palace and the guide mentioned that CV was 6 feet tall, hence perhaps the posture issue? In any case, her genes are still in the family, since the current (11th) Duke is 6'5"". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.153.100 (talk) 10:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ethnicity question

edit

The term half-Cuban, half-American as applied to Consuelo's godmother makes no sense. Consuelo Yznaga's father was a Cuban diplomat who moved permanently to the U.S. and Consuelo was born in Louisiana. She was 100% "American," not half. --Michael K SmithTalk 00:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dealing with ethnicity as a topic, I understand what both the original author and you mean. The term "half-English-American" might be a bit awkward, though, and may not be thoroughly true. LTC (Ret.) David J. Cormier (talk) 15:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Esperantist?

edit

Can anyone more knowledgeable confirm or deny this blog post which claims she favored/learned Esperanto? Thanks. Pikolas (talk) 13:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Consuelo Vanderbilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Consuelo Vanderbilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The non-encyclopedic tone of this article is incredibly distracting. Too many adjectives & adverbs, and excessively judgmental & value-laden — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.230.137.44 (talk) 00:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I suppose you are right. It is a pleasure to read, however. Ttulinsky (talk) 00:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply