Talk:Coming of Age Ceremony (Japan)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by SunDawn in topic Feedback from New Page Review process

Merging it into "Coming of Age Day" edit

Someone keeps redirecting this article to "Coming of Age Day," which is inappropriate. The Ceremony is not necessarily associated with the Coming of Age Day (second Monday of January); many Japanese minicipalities hold the Ceremony on some other day during March, April, May, or August. Penerrantry (talk) 03:57, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Merge selectively. The opening sentence says that this is the ceremony performed on that day. In addition the article is full of commentary and information not germane to an encyclopedia article.Onel5969 TT me 10:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    The first sentence has been amended. This is a partial translation of the Coming of Age Ceremony (a separate article from the Coming of Age Day) article in Japanese Wikipedia. We will continue our translation, especially issues surrounding the Ceremony. In any case, the article should not be part of the Coming of Age Day, which is a national holiday. Penerrantry (talk) 17:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    I think "Coming of Age Day" and "Coming of Age Ceremony" should be two separate articles. "Coming of Age Day" is a national holiday in Japan. Some prefectures in Japan may host "Coming of Age Ceremony" not necessarily on "Coming of Age Day". It is very confusing to merge these two articles. Joshuasqupie (talk) 01:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    The article on "Coming of Age Ceremony" should be independent. While "Coming of Age Day" is just a holiday, "Coming of Age Ceremony" has a special meaning for people in Japan. Jun Kanazawa (talk) 02:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • We'll wait to hear from some folks who aren't all in the same class. Please see WP:CANVASSING.Onel5969 TT me 11:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Joshuasqupie and Jun Kanazawa are not students in the class. Penerrantry (talk) 19:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Really? Could have fooled me with that "This user is a student editor in UC_Berkeley/Reading_Japanese_Texts_(Fall)" banner on their talk pages. Onel5969 TT me 19:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    They are educators monitoring the course because they are interested in offering a similar course. They do not participate in class activities. Penerrantry (talk) 22:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Okay, so they are interested parties, same rational applies. And they can no longer say they don't participate in class activities, cause posting here, just did. Onel5969 TT me 22:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Please be reasonable. Why are they interested parties? They want to learn how it is like to incorporate Wikipedia writing in their courses; they are not interested in our course per se. This is not a course discussion board. Anyone who reads the article and this thread of discussion can articulate their opinion. Writing here is not a course activity by any means. May I suggest that we suspend this discussion for a while? In the meantime, we will work hard to win your approval in the near future. Penerrantry (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Seriously? If you cannot understand why 2 people who are involved in the class that is working on this article are not interested parties, there is seriously nothing more to discuss. Onel5969 TT me 02:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Feedback from New Page Review process edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating the article!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply