Talk:Cologne Mani-Codex

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

(Rated Start-class)

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt

(Rated Start-class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

WikiProject Literature

(Rated Start-class)

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please verify the source and copyright status of this translation (not the orginal document) before moving--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 21:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Date of the codexEdit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(...) "a minuscule papyrus codex, dated on paleographical evidence to the fifth century" - a something wrong. The oldest minuscules came from 8th century. Perhaps it is not minuscule codex, or the codex is not so old. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 16:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think this refers to minuscule as in very small sized, which it undoubtedly is. However, I can see how this can be misinterpreted. Ernie (talk) 13:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spelling in reference linkEdit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The first reference link refers to the "Main Codex" twice, should be Mani Codex, right? 150.101.174.148 (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree with that impression and took the liberty to change it accordingly. Ernie (talk) 13:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Add topic