Talk:Clint Eastwood filmography

Directed only

Contrary to what is claimed, this list seems to only have movies Eastwood has appeared in. Directed-only films such as Bird and Mystic River are left out. Wasted Time R 16:48, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Pre-FLC review

A quick scan; I'll get anything I miss at FLC:

• Unlink [[United States|American]], common geographical terms shouldn't be linked per WP:OVERLINK.
• "He has appeared in over sixty television shows and films"
• "Eastwood ventured into directing in the 1970s" "ventured" leads to the inference that it was but a side job, not a focused effort, can you use a better verb (very picky, I know)?
• "a box office revenue tracking website"-->a box-office-revenue tracking website
• "films which Eastwood "-->films that Eastwood
• Put em dashes in the blank cells. I forgot to mention this in the Arnold Schwarzenegger filmography FLC. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Clint Eastwood filmography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090112202716/http://movies.yahoo.com:80/movie/contributor/1800019744/filmography to http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/contributor/1800019744/filmography

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Name credits

I agree with the recent changes that have attempted to be made. I understand the common name principle, I don't think that applies here. We're not talking about how the character should be referred to in other texts, we're talking about the credited role. The character from A Fistful of Dollars is "Joe". Joe may also be referred to as the "Man with No Name", but he's still Joe. I don't think we should start using nicknames for literary characters in the columns designated for credits. SweetTaylorJames (talk) 20:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

WP:COMMONNAME: "Some topics have multiple names ... [Wikipedia] generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources)". The name "Man with No Name" is more recognizable than Joe, Manco, and Blondie. This also makes sorting names easier. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

I'll stand by my vote, especially given that I don't believe they're necessarily the same character, as the man with no name was an invention of the American marketplace. But until there's a majority vote in this direction, I won't make the change, I'll stick with the community vote. SweetTaylorJames (talk) 04:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC)