Talk:Clifford Geertz
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ckelln.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
editCan anyone provide me with an adequate description of the Mannheim Paradox? The Fronde 00:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
POV seriously
editGeertz has been severly criticized from numerous distinct schools of thought, and this article has the guts to say that nearly no one would criticize him. Isn't that a bit "thick". 88.114.154.216 (talk) 14:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure what you're saying here. That the article doesn't adequately criticise him? (your text says does, but that's a typo, no?) If so, leave some references here, or add this material yourself?Tim bates (talk) 19:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Recent Edits
editI added a picture for visual aids for the article next to the mention of Geertz's "Deep Play." Ckelln (talk) 01:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clifford Geertz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141221022028/http://lucy.ukc.ac.uk/CSACSIA/Vol14/Papers/ryle_1.html to http://lucy.ukc.ac.uk/CSACSIA/Vol14/Papers/ryle_1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)