Talk:Citrus (manga)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Historyday01 in topic Critical reception

Bad ISBN edit

ISBN 978-4-7580-7372-4 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum, the "Japanese ISBN" for No. 3 November 18, 2014, is causing a Checkwiki error #73 "ISBN-13 with wrong checksum". I cannot easily find Japanese ISBNs. Would somebody who has access to No. 3 please correct it? You can test an ISBN by clicking on its link; bad ISBNs produce an error message. Thanks. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Fixed.-- 20:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Critical reception edit

The four sources cited in the reception section are all North American English-language websites. The lack of a Japanese perspective, particularly on the elements perceived as "problematic", seems pretty glaring. Surely there are more notable Japanese sources than Anime Feminist (which is literally just a blog). 73.187.232.41 (talk) 04:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Since this is the English Wikipedia, are non-English reviews even necessary? (they are also hard to come by but that is a different topic) Also Anime Feminist's writers have also written for other websites such as Comic Book Resources, Anime News Network, and Crunchyroll on occasions, so I wouldn't consider it a "blog". Link20XX (talk) 04:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
It could be difficult, but being a Japanese manga with a large Japanese readership (even if it was one of the yuri manga with a particularly large international audience) it's probably prudent to include a couple, or cut the number of English-language reviews cited; without getting too much into the weeds of it, sites like Anime Feminist only speak for one part of anime/manga fandom even in the West, and I doubt that the interpretation of Citrus as "problematic" is as universal as implied by the Reception section.

73.187.232.41 (talk) 04:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you can find reviews, you are more than welcome to add them. However, as stands currently, all the sources cited in the article are reliable. Please do not remove them against the consensus as such. Also all-English reviews is used in multiple featured articles (Tokyo Mew Mew for instance). If you really think that is a problem, best to take it there too. Link20XX (talk) 04:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
The standard at WP:GLOBAL also only compares English nations (UK vs US for instance). Link20XX (talk) 04:46, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Exactly. There are bound to be other reviews out there. I didn't find them when I did a source, and added in those English-language websites (CBR, Okazu, Anime Feminist, and THEM Anime Reviews) because I was most familiar with those. I personally wouldn't add Japanese reviews because for one, I don't know Japanese and secondly, I don't know what are the ones to use, other than what's listed on WP:A&M/ORS. But, feel free to add those if you can find reviews, 73.187.232.41. Historyday01 (talk) 13:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply