Talk:Chud
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Previous move edit
Changed the spelling and moved the article to Chudes. I wonder whether the information is NPOV.--Wiglaf 14:25, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Requested move edit
This move has been also discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chud (disambiguation). In particular, Aaron Brenneman (talk · contribs) has proposed:
Normal form for (non-mythical) people appears to be singular: Inuit, Aborigine. Thus move Chudes to Chud put
at the top of it and C.H.U.D., leave CHUD pointing as it is now, and still delete this disambig.
I think that this is the best possible solution to resolve the possible conflicts between chud, chudes, C.H.U.D., and CHUD, with the additional advantage of removing the redundant and useless page Chud (disambiguation). Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support, as the proponent. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:07, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- I have added a note at Talk:C.H.U.D.. Physchim62 (talk) 13:32, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- This move affects that page: thank you for leaving a note there (I should have done it myself). Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 16:54, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Move request fulfilled. Rob Church Talk 19:13, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
No references! edit
This article should provide some references.
got some, going to work further with it.--Termer 04:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
"History of Estonia" -box edit
Is that box really necessary on the page and specially on the top of the page? Chud is a general term for different Finnic groups and therefore part of the history of many different tribes, nations etc. In this light that infobox seems little exaggerated. What do you think? --Velivieras (talk) 18:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- This issue didn`t stirr up much debate. I considered to be best to remove the box because of arguments mentioned above.--Velivieras (talk) 13:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
The Volok people? edit
I removed the following unsourced sentence: "Later sources used chud to describe other Finnic peoples called volok, which is thought to refer to the Karelians." "Volok" is Russian for "portage" and as far as I know it wasn't used as an ethnonym. I guess, that sentence is supposed to be about "Chud' Zavolochskaya", which means "Chudes of the land across the portages" (see ru:Заволочье and ru:Чудь заволочская), but for now the sentence is wrong. Q-Wert-273 (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
