External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Christopher Paul Neil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Christopher Paul Neil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Swirly faced paedophile listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swirly faced paedophile. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. MelanieN (talk) 04:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Vico (pedophile) listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vico (pedophile). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. MelanieN (talk) 04:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

how did nobody in the US nor Thailand nor Canada figure this guy out lmfao edit

how im serious this is not a joke, how are police this incompetent

the language in that one section of this article needs to be changed to be more degrading towards the police forces in this matter, as a way to remember that they were grossly incompetent during the investigation. 2001:56A:F2B1:7A00:69C8:E8B3:ADA6:EC3D (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

As much as i agree about the law enforcements issues and 'incompetence', Wikipedia should remain unbiased. JcwDenno (talk) 12:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply