 | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 May 2012. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
If people are going to be critical of the article, it would be helpful if you could use the talk page to explain what you think the issues are. Anyone is welcome to edit the article to fix any problems that you think it has, but just adding a tag to the page without explaining the reasons behind it isn't really helpful MarkSG (talk) 10:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Given that the result of the deletion debate was to keep, without any significant dissension, I think the notability question has been pretty much settled now. That being the case, the tag really ought to come off as well. I'll give it a few days in case there are any other comments here, but in the absence of other opinions I'm planning to remove it at the weekend. MarkSG (talk) 21:12, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Since nobody has made any edits to remove any of the external links or rewrite the content, I think it's fair to say now that the overall tone of the article is acceptable. I am, therefore, planning to remove the advert tag from the page. As before, I'll give it a few days (probably until next weekend) before removing it in case there are any comments here. MarkSG (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I got sidetracked and forgot that I'd intended to come back to this article and remove the tag! Anyway, I have now removed it. MarkSG (talk) 18:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- O.K., no problem. I am going to de-link this article so that I won't 'watch' it anymore. Bearian (talk) 20:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)