Talk:Chino Hills, California

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Location map edit

in the template, the location map of california highlights Orange County rather than San Bernardino

"Residential city" edit

What is a "residential city"? As opposed to, say, a "non-residential city"? Did the author mean "bedroom community" or "suburb"? thx. -THB 07:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

changed to "Los Angeles suburb" 71.116.162.167 00:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Los Angeles or San Bernardino? edit

Although Chino Hills is located in San Bernardino County, I believe it is generally considered a suburb of Los Angeles because, although its residents travel to both cities, they are more likely to travel west to L.A. than to San Bernardino. Reviewing traffic patterns on the freeway seem to substantiate this. What are the distances from Chino Hills to Los Angeles versus San Bernardino? What do others think? Alanraywiki 04:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Definitely. It's 28 miles to LA and 40 to San Bernardino, with traffic heading east substantially worse. Most in Chino Hills do all their shopping and errands in neighboring cities like Brea, Diamond Bar, San Dimas, Phillips Ranch, rarely heading east of Ontario.71.116.174.195 23:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I was accused of vandalism by User:MountCan for keeping Chino Hills as a suburb of Los Angeles rather than of San Bernardino. I would like other editors that know the area to weigh in on the appropriate city. Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 22:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Because so many residents of Chino Hills work in both Los Angeles and in Orange County, maybe just referring to it as a suburb would be a compromise wording: Chino Hills is a suburb located in San Bernardino County, California, United States. Thoughts from anyone? Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Changed to compromise wording. It is now just a suburb, not specifically of L.A. or San Bernardino. Alanraywiki (talk) 04:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Below it said it was a suburb of LA, now its in the SB-Riv Metro, why would it be an LA suburb? Would you be okay if we removed LA suburb? Or how about we add "...is a suburb in the Riverside-San Bernardino metropolitan area? House1090 (talk) 04:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I removed any reference in that section to being a suburb of anywhere, and the lead section just indicates just that it is a suburb. Just because it is in San Bernardino County does not mean that San Bernardino should be a reference point. As Los Angeles is one of the most well-known cities in the world and is closer to Chino Hills than San Bernardino, it is a better reference point. Alanraywiki (talk) 05:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

But that does not make it an LA suburb, its in SB metropolitan area. But yea it is closer to LA, I guess I could live with it being an LA suburb, even if I dont agree, its fine if you want to change it back. House1090 (talk) 05:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

If one looks at commuter flow data [1], it becomes quite obvious that Chino Hills is a suburb of Los Angeles. The top 10 places of work for residents of Chino Hills are as follows (with number of residents working in said places listed): (1) Los Angeles 3400, (2) Chino Hills 3215, (3) Chino 1875, (4) Ontario 1305, (5) Pomona 1295, (6) Anaheim 1290, (7) Brea 975, (8) Diamond Bar 690, (9) Santa Ana 670, (10) Fullerton 580. Total flow into employment areas breaks down as follows: 10% stay in Chino Hills, 23% work in Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area, 44% work in Los Angeles area, 22% work in Santa Ana-Anaheim area. One can make the argument that it is a suburb of both areas but if one were to choose only one, Los Angeles would be it. --Polaron | Talk 17:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's not a suburb of LA. People who live there would laugh at you for saying that. I speak from experience. They are two different worlds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.138.242.70 (talk) 19:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

vandalism edit

there's been a strange increase in vandalism. people seem to be taking off digits from the income levels (i.e., $100,349 --> $70,439) and population to make them both seem lower. anyone know why this may be? 71.116.173.172 (talk) 05:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

the lottery winner decreased the income levels of everyone else — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.187.167.72 (talk) 04:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

the old protection order should be maintained due to the lottery winning there, as evidenced by the above comment, which is not appropriate here but at least is not in the article. PS im the winner, na na na na na.(mercurywoodrose)2602:304:CFD0:6350:5CAB:2BA0:830F:9453 (talk) 05:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

sheriff's station edit

The Chino Hills Sheriff's station no longer covers unincorporated areas. This is now done by the sheriff's Fontana station. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.55.83.10 (talk) 16:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Chino Hills, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Chino Hills, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chino Hills, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Chino Hills, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply