This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chester R. Davis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Saying "he was decorated" is meaningless. Decorated with what? Millions of soldiers get decorated every year; it's not notable unless it's a notable decoration.
Please keep the wikilinks for Committee of 49. Since Mr. Davis's notability is based on his appointment there, surely it merits an article explaining its accomplishments.
Please use the active voice, and stop reverting to the passive voice.
That said, there is no source for this claim. Please provide one before removing the fact tag. THF (talk) 18:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sources were cited when the content was added. You didn't even read its title. Read them, and stop being silly. And stop rewriting the text to falsify who actually did the appointing. The source is clear. Read it. Uncle G (talk) 03:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply