| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
 | A fact from Chen Quanguo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 29, 2023. |
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chen Quanguo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116182348/http://leaders.people.com.cn/GB/10487050.html to http://leaders.people.com.cn/GB/10487050.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Read template for source of info edit
Hi. There seems to be pretty serious misinterpretation on a revert explaination [1] : the source of info is the page's template of exhaustive information, if it wasn't read before. A retraction of the misinterpretation would be a good faith sign @CaradhrasAiguo that the misinterpretation was a simple error. Thanks. Pasdecomplot (talk) 14:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Expanded sections edit
"Career" was expanded into different sections, per BLPN. Any thoughts about joining "Henan and Hebei" into a section instead of two separate sections? Thanks. Pasdecomplot (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
draconian edit
Nishidani, my concern was that the assertion was sourced in the lead to a first-person piece. If the assertion is adequately sourced in the section, I'd prefer we move a better source to the lead or simply remove this source. I don't think we can source that assertion to the source it seems to be cited to. —valereee (talk) 17:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- In editing, one can revert, or examine the merits of the edit one might have some reservations about. Mere removal does not help, though it saves time (for one editor, while wasting the time of the other), as opposed to examining the point in depth. One doesn't need the relevant sections to appreciate that Chen Quanguo had, wherever he has authority, resulted in draconian measures. I haven't checked the text but his fanatical insistence, for example, that Tibetans desiring to be married be married off to Han-people is an egregious instance of hardline implementation of a racial policy designed to marry out people of Tibetan descent, and, at the same time, ensure that the Han component sees to it that Chinese is spoken at home and Tibetan - a language with a magnificent plurimillenial literature - be extinguished. This and many other repulsive policies are well known to area experts, and what the Uyghur woman stated is a cliohé. The Uyghurs liken him to Wang Chen (王震) whom our wiki bio doesn't tell much about: he was the sadist who, back in the early fifties in Xinjiang domineered an incident where a Han soldier boiled pork in public in a Muslim village and was killed by one or two outraged villagers, retaliated by placing a lockdown on the town, shooting the ostensible culprits in the village square and then, after cooking several pigs, forcing all of the Muslim inhabitants at gunpoint to swallow pieces of pigmeat. Do what you like, but don't remove the substance of what is obvious and widely sourced. If you want shift her testimony downpage It is not collaborative simply to wipe out material that is congruent with the topic. That scars the text as it spurns the work of those who edit it, who have some knowledge of the topic area.Nishidani (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
her “testimony” seems nothing but lies and falsehood. does anyone really believe thatRJS001 (talk) 22:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
December 25, 2021 edit
What happened on December 25, 2021? Please update the article. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 17:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)