Talk:Chemical Sound

Latest comment: 11 years ago by My76Strat in topic Client list totally wrong

Untitled edit

The client list was added to the first paragraph, by the original owner Murray Mitchell.

      • ("Client list totally wrong" entry on Talk.)

Physical evidence rather then any threat to client or witness was given simply with reference to the Yellow pages and White page phone directories, hard copy of the phone number "416-971-9635" for the stated 92 to 96 period of original ownership. The producer, song writer, sound designer was also a broadcast designer at the largest private broadcaster in Canada, in journalisim and productions, declining suggestion and invitation to other positions to tend the studio operations with his business partner Daryl. Interferring with the wording of the original owner is suspect, "vendetta"?,.

Client list totally wrong edit

The client list in the article is not only uncited, it isn't even close to the client list on the business's web site.[1]. Deleting client list. --John Nagle (talk) 02:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the client list is contentious in its current form, I've added a few more sources, but even they do not support the inclusion. Rather than deleting the inclusion, I've placed a citation needed tag, since it's not apparent vandalism or overly negative, giving the editor who included it some time to cite the material. If it remains unsourced, it should be removed, or aligned with existing sources, in a short period of time (reasonably one week). A larger concern for this article involves the subject's own notability! The significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject are not apparent and the article is in peril of deletion if an AfD was opened for discussion. So I'll be looking to include some of these sources as well, and invite others interested to do the same. Thank you for starting this discussion so we can set about correcting the shortfalls and improving this article. 76Strat String da Broke da (talk) 01:44, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply