This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
This redirect is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it (including peers) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I am not in principle against turning this article into a redirect. Actually, I have some sympathy for the view that there are too many articles on royal children who have done nothing notable except being born. Nevertheless, a decision to run an article into a redirect is almost a deletion, such a decision should not be taken without discussion, either by consensus or a clear decision at e.g. AFD level. PatGallacher (talk) 16:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm not bolshy, and support Jimmy Wales in his belief that pages listing the aristocracy are important and valuable as the individuals are inheritantly socially notable, but I believe children and the unachieving should be simply listed on the overview page for the noble title. e.g. in this case, a listing on the page for Earl of Snowdon. Charles to date has only been a page to the monarch. So a full page entry is somewhat ridiculous. Engleham (talk) 13:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Considering that the policy is to use the mother's maiden name in the info box, how should it be addressed? At the time of her marriage to David Armstrong-Jones, she was known as Hon. Serena Stanhope; but since her father succeeded to his earldom, she is technically entitled to the style "Lady Serena Stanhope". For the moment, I've changed it to "Rt. Hon. Serena Stanhope" to "Hon. Serena Stanhope", as she was never entitled to the former style. What does everyone think? ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 06:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
