Talk:Chamois leather

[Untitled]

Evidently mistake, but common in the English language dictionaries and encyclopedias:

Chamois (ger. gämse, pol. giemza) leather was made of the chamois (goatlike antilope living in the mountains of Europe) tanned like a boxcalf with chromium, instead od false chamois leather made od sheep hides tanned with oils. The difference is that true chamois is delicate, water resistant, and extremely valuable (excellent material for gloves and elegant shoes), when false chamois is water absorbable, less delicate, much less expensive, and is used for cleaning purposes Belissarius 20:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Would high-end leather be tanned with chrome? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Pouches? Is that what is meant by puches on the front page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.9.46.242 (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Polish article

It seems pl:Giemza is for bags and so on, and pl:Ircha is for cleaning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.30.179.65 (talk) 10:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Swimming

I came here looking for information about the towels made from this material (and synthetic imitations) used by swimmers and divers, but that is not even mentioned. It really seems like something about that should be in the article. Tad Lincoln (talk) 01:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chamois leather. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110708110254/http://c2f.com/html/productdetail.asp?PRO-C50 to http://c2f.com/html/productdetail.asp?PRO-C50

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Window cleaning

Bizarrely there is no mention of one one of the main uses of chamois leather cloths: window cleaning. Nearly every window cleaner had a chamois leather cloth for doing the windows and most domestic situations had one as well.

Seems it's yet another article written from a largely U.S. perspective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.130.113.142 (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Wash-leather

Wash-leather redirects here, but the term is not mentioned in the article. It occurs quite frequently in early 20th cent. English literature (& possibly earlier), often in a context other than its use as a cleaning aid, which can be confusing, so I believe it should be included in the article. In particular, "wash-leather" is sometimes used to describe fine book-binding leather; I don't know if this refers to genuine chamois—more research needed—if so, it should be added to the list of uses. I will dig, but as usual feel free to jump in. --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

The OED has for wash-leather "A soft kind of leather, usually of split sheepskin, dressed to imitate chamois leather". DuncanHill (talk) 22:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, too bad the full OED is no longer free online. I suspect I need 18th-early 20th cent. sources (esp. for the book-binding use), scroll down on the linked page to see usage by year: Collins Dictionary --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 09:40, 13 February 2020 (UTC)