| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Catalina affair article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 13, 2015, June 13, 2018, and June 13, 2022. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Untitled edit
There is no evidence of presence of electronic surveilence aboard the Catalinas.
The Catalinas were on international waters.
- Both of the above statements are correct. The shot-down Catalina (not plural) was not on a surveilence mission, but on a rescue mission, searching for the lost DC-3 aircraft. 83.250.228.140 20:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
clarification edit
so how many of the supposed (8) original ypb crew ditched, died, were rescued?
- All five crew members from the Canso were rescued by the German freighter.83.248.24.253 14:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Catalina affair. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.scandjfs.com/Vol.%2014%20No.%201%202008.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Fake Picture edit
The picture looks very obviously faked to me.
178.15.145.204 (talk) 11:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Concur. It looks photo-shopped, and not well. CsikosLo (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- I can't find any information about this picture online, other than at the file description page (File:Catalina affair 1952.jpg), which claims it was contemporary to the affair. I wonder if it was originally meant to be a recreation of the events and not intended to be taken as a real photo. This article says the people in the boats are supposed to be the crew of the Catalina rowing away from the sinking plane. clpo13(talk) 16:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- According to this source (cited on the German page) the Catalina crew was rescued by the nearby German ship Münsterland, whose crew witnessed the entire event and from which the photo presumably was taken:
- Bengt Grisell u. a (2007). The DC-3 – A KTH Project (pdf). Stockholm: Kungliga Tekniska högskolan. p. 11. ISBN 978-91-633-1328-8.
- Lklundin (talk) 13:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- No, what you think is evidence of PhotoShopping is almost certainly contemporary manual retouching to make the photograh more clear for low-resolution newspaper reproduction. Unlike the crew dinghies, the colour scheme of the aircraft would have blended in with the sea (as it was obviously meant to!), which would not have reproduced well. In fact, the same photograph appeared in the Illustrated London News magazine of 28 June 1952, and in that is noticably less retouched (if at all), as its photographic reproduction was of a higher standard than contemporary newspapers. It would also have been prepared a few days before the publication date, leaving little time for a "recreation" after the shootdown on 16 June. Nick Cooper (talk) 15:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- I can't find any information about this picture online, other than at the file description page (File:Catalina affair 1952.jpg), which claims it was contemporary to the affair. I wonder if it was originally meant to be a recreation of the events and not intended to be taken as a real photo. This article says the people in the boats are supposed to be the crew of the Catalina rowing away from the sinking plane. clpo13(talk) 16:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Soviet propaganda edit
Surveillance flights in properly marked aircraft operating in international airspace are most certainly NOT "spying." These flights are completely legal under international law and always have been. "Spying" has been the Soviet excuse for repeated acts of air piracy and the murder of hundreds of military aircrew and civilians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.166.3 (talk) 13:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)