| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Birth date edit
Right from the first version this article says she was born both in 1976 and 1985! PamD (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Carla Ortiz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612144119/http://www.lostiempos.com:80/oh/entrevista/entrevista/20100509/carla-ortiz-el-esfuerzo-paga_69349_127750.html to http://www.lostiempos.com/oh/entrevista/entrevista/20100509/carla-ortiz-el-esfuerzo-paga_69349_127750.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Syria edit
Text on Syria has been removed as "controversial", citing BLP. It seems that this element of her life is notable - it has been one of her main activities in recent years. The removed text could have been written more encyclopedically, so I propose something like the following edited version:
During the Syrian Civil War, the actress has sided with the government of Bashar al-Assad, with several "chaperoned"[1] visits to the country, which she has reported in videos widely disseminated by pro-government, pro-Kremlin and conspiracy theory outlets such as Sputnik, Russia Today, One America News Network and GlobalResearch, as well as by the Daily Express, Telesur and the Jimmy Dore show.[2][3][4]
BobFromBrockley (talk) 09:46, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://pulsemedia.org/2017/08/22/did-a-kremlin-pilgrimage-cause-alternet-bloggers-damascene-conversion/.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ Fact checking Carla Ortiz's claims on White Helmets and Aleppo in Syrian civil war, WikiTribune
- ^ http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/syrien-russlands-feldzug-gegen-die-wahrheit-a-1184533.html.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ Muhammad Idrees Ahmad Syria: on academic freedom and responsibility OpenDemocracy 26 April 2018
- References 1 and 4 are of questionable reliability; reference 2 is definitely not. GiantSnowman 09:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Sources 1 and 4 are far more reliable and neutral than the source "AgoraVox" present in the article, which is not acceptable by Wikipedia standards at all, but conspirationnist ! If you consider them containing also opinions, they are written by acknowledged journalists, and are true, not any reliable sources denied what they say, Carla Ortiz didn't attack them for defamation, nor anything. I disagree with the fact that you erased everything while you acknowledge that the Spiegel is perfectly reliable. I didn't add The Syria Campaign in the sources because for this one, it is clearly engaged and not neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FromNewsToEncyclopedia (talk • contribs) 10:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)- AgoraVox also removed. You have bot dealt with the issues at hand. GiantSnowman 10:09, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Great that AgoraVox was removed. But the sentence now in Controversy is not true. It is not Der Spiegel who "accuses" her. FromNewsToEncyclopedia (talk) 12:02, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- AgoraVox also removed. You have bot dealt with the issues at hand. GiantSnowman 10:09, 27 July 2018 (UTC)