Talk:Cardiff Bay Development Corporation

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 91.84.189.190 in topic Lack of Reference to it's controversial nature

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cardiff Bay Development Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lack of Reference to it's controversial nature edit

There is little reference to the various issues that were controversial 1. That the Body was a Welsh Office Quango, and not answerable to Cardiff Council. 2. That it displaced a multiracial /multi ethnic community, Tiger Bay. 3. The controversy around the environmental impact 4. The shower scale of money put into the Development and whether or not the money could/should have been spent elsewhere in Wales.

These were themes from the time and seem underdeveloped in the article. 91.84.189.190 (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply