Talk:Canine penis
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canine penis redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 December 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
_part_2.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
Noinclude tags edit
Why are there noinclude HTML elements at this page? I know how no include works, but shouldn't they only be used at templates? --Bringback2ndpersonverbs (talk) 08:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Why is the German article so much more detailed? edit
Do Germans just really love dog penises? Alex of Canada (talk) 06:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Is this article really needed? edit
I agree with MarialeegRVT on merging into Canine Reproduction. Any unique content on this page is equally relevant there and likely would have a wider audience; the articles also overlap significantly. Nevertheless, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Canine_penis user Negingxiilch78 advocated for keeping it. Let's discuss it here. Jtrevor99 (talk) 19:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- One of the reasons I felt comfortable merging the articles is that the information contained in the section Canine reproduction#Copulation is verbatim to the info contained in the introduction of Canine penis. Additionally, the information in Canine reproduction#Canine_sexual_anatomy_and_development was severely lacking, and actually contained no specific details about anatomy. My thought process was since Canine penis had a more thorough section on the anatomy and since the rest of the article is identical to info in Canine reproduction, I vote to merge the two. I know there was some concern about the possibility of expansion from the German article, but it seems safe to assume that this is not on anyone's agenda, since the tag has been up since 2013. MarialeegRVT (talk) 01:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- If there are no contrarian replies within 72 hours, I won’t oppose redoing the Merge. Thanks. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- OK, I think someone would have replied by now if there was any interest. It's not been 72 hours but the one person who spoke against it was pinged, and there has been enough time. Feel free to redo the merge. Thanks for your patience! Jtrevor99 (talk) 18:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)