Talk:Brown Line (CTA)
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Brown Line (CTA). |
 | On 13 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to CTA Brown Line. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
inaccurate link
editThe link for the Southport station's reference to "Music Box Theatre" connects to information on the Music Box Theatre located in New York City. This is inaccurate. For correct information on the Music Box Theatre located in Chicago, on Southport (along the Brown Line of the CTA), visit http://www.musicboxtheatre.com/aboutus.html Kathleentsy 05:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
'Belmont' destination sign
editI moved the "Belmont" graphic to the bottom of the station list because it makes no sense at the top. Kimball is the only northern (outbound) terminus of Brown Line service, so it should be at the top of the list, which starts with Kimball Station first. Belmont is one of two southern (inbound) termini -- the shuttle train stops at Belmont, while "normal" service continues on to the Loop. By this logic, Belmont should be at the inbound/southern/bottom end of the station list. Or, someone who dislikes this slightly inelegant solution can do what they did over at Purple Line (Chicago Transit Authority), and put the destination signs in their own table in a separate section. Wiki Wistah 23:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge proposal
editI propose that Ravenswood Branch (CTA) be merged into Brown Line (Chicago Transit Authority). The branch lies within the scope of Brown Line and we really don't have enough information there to warrant a split into an article that's probably going to be a stub/start class for a long time. Additionally, the article only has two references, one of which is time sensitive and will no longer be relevant after July 21, 2012. This is pretty much a duplicate of part of the Brown Line article. Lost on Belmont 3200N (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support. I was going to suggest this myself.—Jeremy (talk) 03:15, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Branches of current lines can be covered well enough in the line articles, and I see no reason why this is an exception. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- I went ahead and redirected. There was little in the article that was not already in this article.—Jeremy (talk) 03:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Brown Line (CTA)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Needs references. Severely underreferenced. There is only one obvious external link reference in the text; it needs to be converted to use <ref> and one of the citation templates. Slambo (Speak) 14:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
Last edited at 19:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 10:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Demolished stations in route maps
editsee: Talk:Purple Line (CTA)#Demolished stations in route maps
Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 18:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Red Line (CTA) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)