Talk:Brooklyn Naval Hospital
 | A fact from Brooklyn Naval Hospital appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 November 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Material from Brooklyn Navy Yard was split to Brooklyn Naval Hospital on September 20, 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Brooklyn Navy Yard. |
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brooklyn Naval Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160530195947/http://gothamist.com/2009/02/19/inside_the_brooklyn_navy_yard_hospi.php to http://gothamist.com/2009/02/19/inside_the_brooklyn_navy_yard_hospi.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Hospital during the Civil war edit
The claim," It was estimated that during the course of the Civil War, the hospital treated almost a quarter of all Union casualties...", is highly dubious at best. Other than the newspaper article from which it is sourced I can find no other proof that it is correct. To the contrary I have found enough to indicate it is not. The next sentence that it was expanded to hold 450 patients at once would also indicate it is untrue. That number of beds wouldn't be near enough to able to handle the quarter of all casualties as claimed, and it should be removed.Jackfork (talk) 12:49, 3 November 2018 (UTC)